The Truth Behind 300: What the Movie Got Right and Wrong About the Battle of Thermopylae

Few movies have carved themselves into pop culture like Zack Snyder’s 300. Released in 2006, this hyper-stylized spectacle transformed the Battle of Thermopylae into a roaring opera of blood, grit, and half-naked Spartans shouting, “This is Sparta!” But how much of this cinematic juggernaut is actually true?

Let’s explore five things the movie nailed—and five it took wild liberties with.

The Things 300 Got Right

1. A Small Spartan Force Did Make a Legendary Stand

The core truth behind 300 is that King Leonidas I of Sparta did, in fact, lead a tiny contingent to face the mighty Persian army of Xerxes I in 480 BCE. Herodotus, the ancient historian, records that Leonidas commanded 300 Spartiates (full Spartan citizens), supported by several thousand other Greeks from allied city-states.

While 300 focuses almost exclusively on the Spartans, it’s historically accurate that these men formed the backbone of the defense. Their professional military discipline and unyielding morale made them famous even in their own time. The Spartans and their allies delayed Xerxes’ advance for several days—an extraordinary feat of valor.

Sources:

Herodotus, Histories (Book VII)
Paul Cartledge, Thermopylae: The Battle That Changed the World

2. The Spartan Hoplite Warrior Culture

The movie shows Spartan warriors raised in an unforgiving system of military training—the agoge—from the age of seven. While 300 exaggerates the brutality and the sheer physical perfection of every Spartan man, the depiction of their lifelong martial discipline is broadly correct.

Spartan boys underwent rigorous training emphasizing toughness, endurance, and obedience. Weak or deformed infants were sometimes exposed and left to die—a grim practice known as apothetae. Adult men lived in communal barracks until age 30, and their main civic duty was warfare.

Sources:

Xenophon, Constitution of the Lacedaemonians
Plutarch, Life of Lycurgus

3. The Persians Vastly Outnumbered the Greeks

300 portrays Xerxes’ army as an endless horde of soldiers stretching from horizon to horizon. While this is an artistic flourish, the Persians really did field an enormous invasion force. Ancient estimates put their numbers as high as 2.5 million men—a figure modern historians dispute.

Contemporary scholars now estimate between 100,000–300,000 Persian troops in Greece. Even at the low end, it was still a massive host compared to the 7,000 or so Greek defenders.

Sources:

Herodotus, Histories
Tom Holland, Persian Fire

4. The Phalanx Formation Was Spartan Standard

When the movie’s Spartans lock shields in disciplined ranks, they are using the famous phalanx formation. This was the backbone of hoplite warfare: a dense line of warriors with overlapping shields and spears projecting forward.

Spartans were renowned for their ability to hold formation under pressure. Their shields were crucial for defense, and their tight ranks created a nearly impenetrable wall—an advantage that allowed them to withstand Persian assaults in the narrow pass of Thermopylae.

Sources:

Victor Davis Hanson, The Western Way of War
Donald Kagan, The Peloponnesian War

5. A Greek Traitor Helped Doom the Defenders

In the film, a disfigured Spartan named Ephialtes betrays Leonidas by revealing a hidden mountain path to the Persians. While the real Ephialtes was not a deformed outcast, there truly was a local Greek named Ephialtes who showed Xerxes the Anopaia path over the ridge behind Thermopylae.

This act of treachery allowed the Persians to outflank the Greek position. Leonidas and his men were surrounded, leading to their heroic last stand.

Sources:

Herodotus, Histories (7.213–218)

The Things 300 Got Wrong

1. The Spartans Wore Armor—Not Leather Speedos

Perhaps the most iconic visual of 300 is the legion of chiseled Spartan warriors clad only in red cloaks, loincloths, and bronze helmets. But in reality, Greek hoplites wore substantial armor:

A cuirass (breastplate) of bronze or layered linen
Greaves protecting their shins
A large round shield (aspis)
A helmet covering much of the face

While it’s visually striking to see the Spartans bare-chested, it’s historically absurd. No Greek soldier would willingly forgo armor, especially in a stand against overwhelming numbers.

Sources:

Peter Connolly, Greece and Rome at War
Paul Cartledge, Thermopylae

2. King Xerxes Was Not a Golden Giant

Rodrigo Santoro’s portrayal of Xerxes as a towering, hairless god-king adorned in gold chains is pure cinematic invention.

The real Xerxes was a Persian Great King who ruled from 486–465 BCE. He was not nearly eight feet tall or covered in piercings. Persian royal inscriptions depict him as an ordinary-looking man, bearded and dressed in fine robes.

The outlandish styling of Xerxes in 300 was meant to underscore the theme of exotic “otherness,” but it has little basis in the historical record.

Sources:

Herodotus, Histories
A.T. Olmstead, History of the Persian Empire

3. The Immortals Did Not Wear Monster Masks

In the film, Xerxes’ elite troops—the Immortals—march in eerie silver masks, resembling sinister demons. In truth, the Immortals were an elite Persian infantry regiment, 10,000 strong, so named because their numbers were always kept at full strength (any casualty was immediately replaced).

They did not wear masks or carry curved daggers as their primary weapons. Instead, they fought with spears, wicker shields, swords, and bows. Their reputation was based on discipline and professionalism, not supernatural terror.

Sources:

Herodotus, Histories (7.83)
Nicholas Sekunda, The Persian Army 560–330 BC

4. Spartan Society Was Not a Pure Meritocracy

300 paints Sparta as an uncompromising society where only strength and skill mattered. In reality, Spartan society was highly stratified and complex:

Spartiates (full citizens) were a minority, supported by a large population of helot serfs.
A strict hereditary system determined status.
Political power was shared between two kings and a council of elders (the Gerousia), not just a single warrior-king.

The film also portrays Leonidas as making decisions alone. Historically, he needed the approval of the ephors (magistrates) and the Gerousia to march to war.

Sources:

Plutarch, Life of Lycurgus
Paul Cartledge, Sparta and Lakonia

5. The Battle Was Not a Stand of Spartans Alone

300 simplifies the story into a tale of 300 Spartans against the world. While the Spartans formed the elite core, thousands of other Greeks fought and died alongside them.

According to Herodotus, the defenders included:

700 Thespians, who chose to remain to the end
400 Thebans
Several hundred others from Phocis and other regions

The film’s final sequence credits only the Spartans with the last stand. In reality, the Thespians deserve as much recognition for their sacrifice.

Sources:

Herodotus, Histories (7.222)

Why Does 300 Matter?

Despite its historical liberties, 300 reintroduced the Battle of Thermopylae to modern audiences. The movie turned an obscure episode of Greek history into a cultural phenomenon and sparked new interest in the Spartans.

The real story of Thermopylae is no less dramatic for being less stylized: a coalition of free Greek city-states held back the greatest empire the world had ever seen, buying time for the rest of Greece to organize resistance.

Three days of defiance inspired generations—and remain a symbol of courage against overwhelming odds.

History in 5 Minutes or less