In the summer of 1971, Americans were stunned when The New York Times began publishing excerpts from a top-secret government study. What spilled out onto the front page wasn’t just another political scandal—it was a revelation that their government had been systematically misleading them about the Vietnam War for years. Known as the Pentagon Papers, this classified report would change public trust in government, redefine press freedom, and set the stage for one of the most turbulent decades in U.S. history.
Let’s dive into the story of how one man, one secret, and one decision rattled the very foundation of American democracy.
A War No One Could Win
By the mid-1960s, the Vietnam War was consuming American lives, money, and patience. Officially, presidents from Harry Truman to Lyndon Johnson insisted that the United States was fighting to defend democracy and stop the spread of communism in Southeast Asia. But privately, doubts festered.
The war was messy: guerilla warfare, shifting battle lines, and a relentless enemy in the Viet Cong. Despite glowing public statements from the White House and Pentagon, U.S. soldiers on the ground knew the reality—victory was elusive. By 1967, over 400,000 American troops were in Vietnam, yet the end was nowhere in sight.
It was during this period of chaos that the Department of Defense, under then-Secretary Robert McNamara, commissioned a massive study. Officially titled “Report of the Office of the Secretary of Defense Vietnam Task Force,” it was a 7,000-page classified analysis covering U.S. involvement in Vietnam from 1945 to 1967.
The study wasn’t meant for public consumption—it was, in essence, an autopsy of America’s Vietnam decisions.
The Man Who Knew Too Much
Enter Daniel Ellsberg, a military analyst and former Marine who worked for the RAND Corporation, a think tank with access to classified Pentagon documents. Ellsberg initially supported the war but grew increasingly disillusioned after trips to Vietnam, where he saw firsthand the human cost and futility.
Ellsberg devoured the Pentagon Papers, and what he discovered enraged him.
The documents revealed that multiple administrations had:
- Misled the public about the war’s progress.
- Downplayed U.S. involvement, including secret bombings in Cambodia and Laos.
- Ignored chances for withdrawal in favor of escalation.
- Privately admitted the war was unwinnable while publicly insisting victory was close.
As Ellsberg later put it, “It was a chronicle of lies.”
Haunted by the deaths of young Americans and Vietnamese civilians, Ellsberg made a radical decision: he would leak the papers.
Smuggling the Secrets
Getting 7,000 pages of classified documents out of a secure environment wasn’t exactly simple. Ellsberg and his colleague, Anthony Russo, began secretly photocopying the papers at night. Each evening, Ellsberg would carry briefcases filled with pages to a friend’s office, where they copied them one by one.
For months, Ellsberg struggled with how best to release the information. At first, he offered the study to members of Congress, including Senator William Fulbright, but none took decisive action. So Ellsberg turned to the press.
He approached The New York Times, whose investigative team immediately recognized the significance of the material. In June 1971, the Times began publishing excerpts.
The headlines hit like a thunderclap:
- “Vietnam Archive: Pentagon Study Traces 3 Decades of Growing U.S. Involvement”
- “Study Reveals U.S. Built Up Vietnam War ‘Decisively’”
Americans were reading, for the first time, the receipts of decades of government deception.
The White House Strikes Back
President Richard Nixon, who had inherited the Vietnam quagmire, wasn’t thrilled. Ironically, the Pentagon Papers didn’t directly implicate his administration—they covered events up to 1967. But Nixon feared the precedent: if the press could publish one classified leak, what would stop future ones?
The Nixon administration scrambled to block further publication. Arguing that national security was at risk, the Justice Department sought an injunction against the Times. For the first time in U.S. history, the federal government tried to stop a newspaper from publishing.
This set up a constitutional showdown.
The Supreme Court Showdown
The case—New York Times Co. v. United States (1971)—escalated at lightning speed. Lawyers argued whether the First Amendment’s guarantee of a free press outweighed the government’s claims of secrecy.
On June 30, 1971, in a 6-3 decision, the Supreme Court ruled in favor of the newspapers. Justice Hugo Black’s opinion was blunt:
“Only a free and unrestrained press can effectively expose deception in government.”
It was a monumental victory for press freedom. The government could not use “prior restraint” to block publication of material simply because it was embarrassing.
The Times, along with The Washington Post and other outlets, continued publishing.
The Fallout
The Pentagon Papers didn’t end the Vietnam War overnight, but they deepened public distrust in the government. Many Americans felt betrayed—learning that presidents had lied, not just about battlefield success, but about the very reasons for being in Vietnam.
The release also emboldened the anti-war movement. Protests intensified, and public support for the war eroded further.
For Nixon, the episode was a turning point. Furious at Ellsberg, he unleashed his infamous “Plumbers” unit—a covert group tasked with stopping leaks. Their bungled attempt to discredit Ellsberg (including a break-in at his psychiatrist’s office) set the stage for something bigger: the Watergate scandal.
In a twist of history, the attempt to silence Ellsberg ended up toppling Nixon himself.
What Happened to Daniel Ellsberg?
Ellsberg was charged with espionage, theft, and conspiracy. If convicted, he faced over 100 years in prison. His trial became a media circus, with Ellsberg unapologetically defending his actions as morally necessary.
But fate intervened. When it was revealed that Nixon’s operatives had engaged in illegal activities to smear Ellsberg—including wiretapping and the break-in—the judge dismissed the case in 1973.
Ellsberg walked free, later becoming a lifelong advocate for government transparency and whistleblower protections.
The Legacy of the Pentagon Papers
The Pentagon Papers didn’t just expose lies—they shifted the relationship between the American people and their government. Some key takeaways:
- Press Freedom Strengthened: The Supreme Court decision remains one of the most important First Amendment rulings in history.
- Distrust in Government: The revelations fueled the post-1970s skepticism of political leaders, paving the way for future cynicism during Watergate and beyond.
- Whistleblower Precedent: Ellsberg became the prototype for later figures like Chelsea Manning and Edward Snowden, who also risked everything to expose government secrets.
- Vietnam War Narrative: While the war dragged on until 1975, the Papers underscored its futility, strengthening the case for withdrawal.
In 2011, on the 40th anniversary of the leak, the government officially declassified the Pentagon Papers—long after their explosive impact had already reshaped history.
Why It Still Matters
The Pentagon Papers remain a powerful reminder of the tension between secrecy and democracy. Governments argue they need confidentiality to function; citizens demand transparency to hold leaders accountable.
As Ellsberg himself put it, “The public is entitled to know the truth about what’s being done in its name.”
In an era when debates about classified leaks, national security, and freedom of the press continue to dominate headlines, the lessons of 1971 still echo loudly.
The Pentagon Papers weren’t just a historical footnote—they were a turning point, showing that even the most powerful government can’t hide the truth forever.
Sources
- Daniel Ellsberg, Secrets: A Memoir of Vietnam and the Pentagon Papers (2002).
- The National Archives: “The Pentagon Papers” archives.gov.
- Sheehan, Neil. A Bright Shining Lie: John Paul Vann and America in Vietnam (1988).
- Supreme Court decision: New York Times Co. v. United States, 403 U.S. 713 (1971).
- The New York Times, Vietnam Archive series (June 1971).
History in 5 Minutes or less 
Leave a comment